2008 (9) TMI 728

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Respondent. [Order per : D.N. Panda, Member (J)]. - Heard both sides. 2. Shri K.K. Banerjee, learned Advocate appearing for the Appellant states that in the Miscellaneous Application for rectification of mistake, the Appellants seek a reduction in the penalty amount to 25% of the duty leviable on the basis of the following two decisions :- (i)      2008 (228 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... amount of penalty so determined has also been paid within the period of thirty days referred to in that proviso :" It is seen from the above that the reduced penalty of 25% under the first proviso to Section 11AC is available if the duty and the interest thereon, are paid within thirty days from the date of communication of the Order as required under the first proviso to Section 11AC. The second .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... de later on after a time-gap on the dates mentioned above. As such, this is a case which involves interest-liability on the duty evaded. There is no evidence on record that the Appellants paid the interest amount within the required time of one month from the date of issue of the impugned Order. Hence, in our view, the benefit of the cited two decisions of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court cannot be ex .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X