Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2008 (12) TMI 493

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... appellants, in this case, have imported a consignment of Tin Mill Black Plate Seconds and filed an into Bond Bill of Entry, which was assessed and goods were allowed to be bonded. While filing the ex-bond Bill of Entry, the appellant over valued their goods inadvertently mentioning the rate of auxiliary duty as 50% instead of 40% in terms of Notification No. 109/91. On realizing the mistake, they....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd was incorrect and was liable to be set aside. The Commissioner (Appeals) did not deal with this aspect and has held that Assistant Commissioner's refund order itself was incorrect, as he could not have sanctioned the refund unless the assessment has been challenged by the appellants and were set aside by the higher authority. Assistant Commissioner (Refund) could not have sit on judgment the as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....customers, the refund should be sanctioned to him instead of crediting the same to the Consumer Welfare Fund. The Commissioner (Appeals) could not have set aside the order of the Assistant Commissioner on the ground that refund cannot be sanctioned without challenging the assessment. It was totally beyond his purview and such an order could have been passed only, if Revenue has come up in appeal c....