Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2009 (5) TMI 651

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Vice-President]. - The Revenue is in appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise (A) setting aside demand of Rs. 2,59,544/- confirmed against the assessees by the Assistant Commissioner, as a result of classification of fruit juice manufactured by the assessees under Chapter Heading 22.02, as against classificati....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986) were liable to a higher rate of duty of excise than what was being levied at the rate applicable to heading No. 20.02 during the period commencing on the 28th March, 1988 and ending with the 19th March, 1990; Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 11C of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), the Centra....