TMI Blog2009 (6) TMI 775X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Secretary, for the Appellant. Shri A.K. Sharma, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. Heard both sides. These fifteen miscellaneous applications for rectification of mistake have been filed by eleven vendors of M/s. Tata Motors against a common final order dated 16-12-08 which was passed earlier in respect of 85 appeals filed by the department and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s are challenging the final order which approved addition of an amount equal to 0.085% in the assessable value towards the cost of drawings and designs on the strength of submissions made by the representatives of M/s. Tata Motors during investigation, who supplied such drawings and designs for getting the impugned goods manufactured by their vendors including the present applicants. In the said f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ayer and submissions now made, it is clear that the present applicants are praying for complete review of the final order by way of filing these miscellaneous applications for rectification of error. It is well settled that the Tribunal can only rectify any error apparent on the face of the record while entertaining a rectification application, but the scope of such rectification does not permit a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rawings merely conveying the physical dimensions of the impugned components as averred by the applicants, but contained technical details representing designs of specific components to be manufactured. The prayer of the applicants, to review this order, made through rectification applications is not legally permissible as the Tribunal has no power to review its own order. We also note that neither ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
