Home /
1963 (2) TMI 43
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ntended, in the first place, that the petitioner purchased standing timber and the Authorities should not have taxed standing timber under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, because standing timber is not goods but immovable property. It must be stated in fairness to Mr. Panda that he did not ultimately press this point. Mr. Panda contended, in the next place, that the petitioner merely chopped t....