Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2010 (3) TMI 921

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Respondent. ORDER Service tax of Rs. 1,52,17,562/- with interest as applicable has been demanded and penalty equal to the service tax has been imposed under Sections 76&78 of Finance Act, 1994. The service tax demand has been confirmed on the ground that the appellants have claimed abatement in terms of exemption notification but have not included the value of steel supplied by the service re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Cemex Engineers v. CST Cochin reported in 2010 (17) S.T.R. 534 (Tribunal) = 2009-TIOL-2208-CESTAT-BANG had held that the cost of the material supplied by the service receiver need not be included whereas this Tribunal in the case of M/s. Jaihind Projects Ltd. v. CST, Ahmedabad reported in 2010 (18) S.T.R. 650 (Tri. - Ahmd.) = 2010-TIOL-124-CESTAT-AHM decided that the value of the goods supplied ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iew of the arguments advanced by the learned SDR, even though we feel prima facie matter has to be remanded to Commissioner since the order of the Commissioner is not clear as to the category of service provided by the appellant and the notification under which they are eligible for abatement, we refrain from doing so. Further, the appellant has also compounded the problem by paying the service ta....