Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1969 (12) TMI 106

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....scribed by the assessee as cotton seeds are not "declared goods" within the meaning of section 8(3)(a) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, as originally enacted. The case of the assessee was that a turnover of Rs. 1,86,848.44 related to sale of cotton seeds, which, according to him, was a declared commodity. This stand was taken by the assessee, at any rate, before the Appellate Assistant Commissi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s were intended for resale by him; but, on the other hand, the purpose disclosed therein was to the effect that the goods were intended for use in the manufacture of goods for sale. The Tribunal noticed the categorical purpose as disclosed in the 'C' form declarations and came, in our opinion, to the correct conclusion and held that the concessional rate was not applicable and that the Appellate A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and reprobate. The counsel's case is that for the purpose of escaping the levy, the goods were characterised as "declared goods" and as the sale in question was a second sale, a point was raised that no tax was leviable at all. In other words, the argument is that for the limited purpose of escaping the levy the goods were characterised as "declared goods" but for the purpose of section 8(3)(a) t....