Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1986 (10) TMI 311

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....passed by the Sales Tax Tribunal, Aligarh Bench, Aligarh. The admitted facts in the case are that Faridabad Manufacturing Company, Ghaziabad, has placed an order with M/s. Shankar Cement Private Ltd., Madras, for the supply of three wagons of cement. Accordingly builty was also prepared in the name of the aforesaid Ghaziabad party. Subsequently, however, this Ghaziabad party endorsed the builty i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s recorded a finding that there was no contract between the assessee-opposite party and the aforementioned Madras party in relation to the goods and that the said Ghaziabad party had also collected U.P. sales tax from the dealer. According to the aforesaid learned counsel the said Ghaziabad party was an "importer" under the U.P. Sales Tax Act. The word "importer" has been defined under section 2(....