Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2011 (2) TMI 990

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a common order as an identical issue is involved.   2. The facts of the case are that the appellant has installed a power plant for generation of electricity. Appellant has used furnace oil and fuel in the power plant and availed cenvat credit of it. A part of the electricity generated has been diverted to the plastic division of the appellant, which is situated in adjoining factory. The app....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g the produced electricity within their factory. They are not entitled to the credit to the extent of excess electricity cleared outside the factory. As such by referring to the above judgment as also to the Tribunal s majority decision in the case of Arvind Mills Ltd. Vs. CCE Ahmedabad reported in 2007 (220) ELT 981 (Tri. Ahmd.), which decision was upset by the Hon ble Supreme Court vide their or....