Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2011 (2) TMI 1057

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Revenue against the order-in-appeal No. PD/225/M-IV/2003  dated 27.10.2003.   2. Brief facts of the case are that M/s. Standard Industries Ltd. - the respondent, during the period from April 98 to April 99 captively consumed yarn to manufacture grey fabrics.The valuation of the said yarn was done as per cost construction basis in terms of Section 4(1) (b) of Central Excise Act 1944 r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sioner (Appeals) upheld the order-in-original by recording clearly that the demand is hit by limitation. Aggrieved by such an order, the Revenue is before us. 4. The respondent is absent despite notice.  Since the issue involved in this case lies in a narrow compass, we take up the appeal for disposal in the absence of any representation from the respondent. 5. The learned DR draws our at....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stribution charges in the value of yarn. It is undisputed that during the relevant period, the respondent had filed price declarations in terms of Rule 173C of erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944. The receipts of the declarations have been acknowledged by the jurisdictional authorities on the respective column.The price declarations included the details of the cost of the product alongwith a cert....