Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2012 (10) TMI 587

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e goods received back by him as defective - no time limit under Rule 16 - As the appellant are entitled to take credit as per Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules 2002, therefore, they have taken credit correctly - appeal is allowed - E/1235/2010 - A/1/2012-WZB/C-V(SMB) - Dated:- 7-2-2012 - Shri Ashok Jindal, J. REPRESENTED BY : Shri Mihir Deshmukh, Advocate, for the Appellant. Ms. D.M .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed by the customers were repairable which were repaired and cleared on payment of duty. The goods which were not repairable were sold by the appellant as scrap. On goods which were sold by the appellant as scrap, the appellant availed credit of duty by following the procedure under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 wherein it is stated that the assessee can avail credit of duty paid by him .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ugned order is to be set aside. 5. On the other hand, the learned AR strongly oppose the contention of the learned counsel and submitted that as per Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules 2002, on the goods received back in their factory, the appellant has to take credit immediately, which they have not taken at the time of receipt of the goods. Therefore, they are not entitled to take credit at a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d as inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 and utilise this credit according to the said rules. (2) If the process to which the goods are subjected before being removed does not amount to manufacture, the manufacturer shall pay an amount equal to the CENVAT credit taken under sub-rule (1) and in any other case the manufacturer shall pay duty on goods received under sub-rule (1) at the rate .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ceived back by him as defective. There is no time limit under Rule 16 ibid. Therefore, the contention of the learned AR is not acceptable. As the appellant are entitled to take credit as per Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules 2002, therefore, they have taken credit correctly. 8. In view of these observations, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed with consequential relief, i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates