Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2013 (10) TMI 494

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ts are manufacturing steel tubes and on the ground that they were selling tubes to M/s. Rajdhani Steel Tubes, a related person at a lower price than other customers, proceedings were initiated. The proceedings has culminated in confirmation of duty demand of Rs.4,90,956/- which has been arrived at by calculating the differential duty payable on the price charged by M/s. Rajdhani Steel Tubes to the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hich was not at all intimated to the department. Further, he also submits that the appellants had promised to abide by the law and pay the duty at the price at which M/s. Rajdhani Steel Tubes were selling the tubes and therefore extended period is invocable. 4. After considering the submissions, we find that as submitted by the learned counsel, Rule 9 of Valuation Rules may not be applicable in t....