Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2013 (11) TMI 230

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... on the value or quantity of clearances in a financial year, and he has been taking CENVAT credit on inputs or input services, before such option is exercised, he shall be required to pay an amount equivalent to the CENVAT credit, if any, allowed to him, in respect of inputs lying in stock or in process or contained in final products lying in stock on the date when such option is exercised and after deducting the said amount from the Cenvat credit balance, if any, lying in his credit, the balance amount of Cenvat credit if any still remaining, shall lapse and shall not be allowed to be utilized for payment of duty on any excisable goods, whether cleared for home consumption or for export. In this case undisputedly the appellant were availin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cial Ltd, reported in 2008 (224) ELT 239 (P&H). He also pleaded that CENVAT credit demand is time barred as the appellant were filing ER-1 returns regularly wherein the availment of CENVAT credit was declared. He, therefore, stated that no information was suppressed from the department and hence the longer period cannot be invoked. He, accordingly, pleaded that the appellant have a strong prima facie case in their favour and, hence, the requirement of pre-deposit of Cenvat credit demand, interest and penalty may be waived for hearing of the appeal and recovery thereof may be stayed during pendency of appeal. 4. Learned D.R. Shri R.K. Mathur opposing the stay application pleaded that the appellants case is squarely covered by Rule 11(2) of....