1999 (12) TMI 838

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Tax Appellate Tribunal allowing the appeal field by the respondentassesee and setting aside the revisional order of the Deputy Commissioner, C.T., Secunderabad Division, in respect of the assessment year 1991-92. 2.. The first item of the disputed turnover relates to the discount. The Deputy Commissioner purported to allocate the discount to the sale price of the bottles and cartons and that of I .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... otes cannot be included in the turnover of the assessee-respondent. The main ground on which the revisional authority subjected this item to tax was that some of the last purchasers (who were also liable to pay tax on last sale), failed to reflect the reduction relatable to credit notes in their net turnover and paid the tax on lesser value only. In other words, some of the purchasers did not decl .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ected from the appellant, it did not preclude the authorities concerned from collecting the tax from manufacturers. Obviously, such an observation by High Court does not amount to declaration that the respondent-company which is a manufacturer is liable to pay the tax, if the tax is not otherwise legally due from the respondent. Hence, we see no ground to admit the T.R.C. The T.R.C. is dismissed a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X