Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2005 (7) TMI 636

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ition is heard finally at the motion stage itself. By filing this petition under article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, a dealer, seeks to challenge an order passed by the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Tax dated October 4, 2004 in revision No. 4/2001/Indore/Prantiya (annexure P 7) communicated to the petitioner by order No. AA/KCG/Revision/2004/339. Facts in brief n....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lso indicates that the petitioner had questioned the legality and validity of the orders by challenging the same in revision. By order dated January 6, 2003 (annexure P5), the learned Additional Commissioner of Commercial Tax dismissed the revision preferred by the petitioner arising out of an order passed in assessment case. In other words the learned revisionary authority dismissed the revision....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rned Additional Commissioner of Commercial Tax exercising the revisionary powers dismissed this application saying that it being a belated effort on the part of the petitioner to ask the revisionary authority to pass the order in penalty case, dismissed the application thereby declining to examine the issue relating to penalty proceedings on merits in his revisionary jurisdiction. It is this order....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gs. In this view of the matter it was obligatory upon the authority to have decided the revision one way or the other on merits so far as penalty proceedings were concerned. When there is a challenge to an order either in appeal or revision, the same has got to be decided one way or the other by the appellate/revisionary authority because it is the right of the litigant to approach the higher cou....