Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2009 (12) TMI 904

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Nos. 1, 2 of 2008 - -<br>CST, VAT & Sales Tax<br>-<br>JAICHANDREN M., J. ORDER:- M. JAICHANDREN J.--As similar issues are arising for consideration in both the writ petitions and since, the reliefs sought for are also similar in nature, a common order is passed by this court in the above writ petitions. It is stated that the second respondent, in W.P. (MD) No. 945 of 2008, who is doing business....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uing a notice, in form 4, on November 27, 2007. Therefore, a notice of attachment and publication of sale notice had been issued, on January 7, 2008. The third respondent, in W.P. (MD) No. 945 of 2008, is holding additional charge of the Ramanathapuram District Cottage Match Manufacturers Association, as an Administrator. Since the arrears had not been settled, even after the issuing of the notic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e writ petition, in W.P. (MD) No. 3713 of 2008, stating that the petitioner-industry, which has been established under the Khadi and Village Industries Commission Act, 1956, and functioning under the administrative control of the Government of India, had granted the loan to the tune of Rs. 238 lakhs to the third respondent, namely, the Ramanathapuram District Cottage Match Manufacturers Associatio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Indian Bank v. Commercial Tax Officer [2009] 25 VST 187; [2009] 6 MLJ 659, wherein, it has been held as follows: &quot;The State Government can claim priority of debt over others in regard to the arrears of tax due to the State. However, when the assets are secured assets with the bank and the bank being the secured creditor and its debt being a secured debt, has its secured interest over the pro....