Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2014 (8) TMI 48

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h ORDER:- The order of the court was made by D.V. SHYLENDRA KUMAR J.-These revision petitions by the State under section 23(1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (for short, "the Act") are directed against the order dated January 20, 2011 passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore, in STA Nos. 1406 to 1408 of 2010, where under the Tribunal had allowed the appeals of the assessee a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....served and represented by Mr. M. Thirumalesh. 4. Smt. S. Sujatha, learned Additional Government Advocate appears for the petitioner-State and Mr. M. Thirumalesh appears for the respondent-assessee. 5. It is submitted by the learned Additional Government Advocate that the question as to whether old news papers are "goods" or otherwise is now covered by an earlier judgment of a Division Bench of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n carried by other dealers on the very question and is now pending before the Supreme Court, more so, in the wake of the earlier decision of the Supreme Court, in Indian Express (P.) Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu reported in [1987] 67 STC 474 (SC), wherein the Supreme Court had opined that the question though had been considered on similar lines in subsequent case this court had distinguished the de....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....his view is disagreed by another Division Bench by taking a contrary view and the matter is required to go before the Larger Bench, the earlier view of the Bench has to be followed. In view of the matter having already been seized before the Supreme Court in the other case and if the assessee cannot pursue the matter, we follow the earlier view taken by the Division Bench in the case of United Age....