2015 (1) TMI 1081

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Appellant. Shri Sudhir Malhotra, Advocate, for the Respondent. ORDER These are applications for restoration of appeal filed by the Revenue. These appeals had earlier been dismissed by the Tribunal vide Final Order No. 58191-58195/2013 dated 7-11-2013 [2014 (299) E.L.T. 381 (Tri. - Del.)] on the ground that while at the time of filing the appeal by the Revenue on 8-7-2005 there was a provision t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tion of the Revenue's appeal placing reliance on the Tribunal's judgment in the case of CCE, Delhi-III v. Om Sairam Trading Company [2009 (243) E.L.T. 617 (Tri. - Del.)] wherein it was held that Revenue's appeal filed on the basis of review order as recorded on the notesheet order is valid and no separate authorization is required. She, therefore, pleaded that Revenue's appeal may be restored as i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hat the order of Commissioner (Appeals) is not legal and proper and authorising a Central Excise Officer for filing the appeal, and that the requirement has not been complied in this case, the Revenue's appeal has been correctly dismissed. 4. We have considered the submissions of both the sides and perused the records and also the photocopy of the notesheets placed before the Tribunal. In th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X