2015 (5) TMI 497

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... apen, Sr. Govt. Pleader JUDGMENT 1. Correctness and sustainability of the condition imposed by the appellate authority as per Ext.P7 order dated 22.08.2014, directing the petitioner to satisfy 30% of the outstanding demand, so as to enjoy the benefit of interim stay during the pendency of appeal, is under challenge in this writ petition. 2. The sequence of events reveals that, Ext.P1 penalty or .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... petitioner to approach this Court by filing this writ petition. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well, who made a reference to the pleadings and proceedings, particularly the contents of Ext.P4 order as to the suppression of the facts made by the petitioner. It is pointed out that, the petitioner was served with proper notice and objection submitted by him was duly considered and it wa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... l for interference as the appellate authority has exercised the discretion in a proper manner. Interference is declined and the writ petition is dismissed. Since the time limit fixed is already over, the petitioner is granted a further time of 'three weeks' to comply with the condition imposed so as to avail the benefit of interim stay. 5. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgme .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X