2015 (6) TMI 956

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in which he set aside the order of Asst. Commissioner and allowed consequential relief. 2. The respondents are agent of M/s. Georg Fischer Piping Systems P. Ltd., Switzerland, who manufactures industrial pipes. The respondent provided service to the entity abroad by way of procuring orders from customers in India. The entity abroad was selling the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ssions. 4. Ld. AR reiterates the grounds of appeal which state that the entire activities are undertaken in India in relation to the sale of the goods in India. He also states that the issue has not been considered extensively by CESTAT in the case of Microsoft Corpn. (I) P. Ltd. Ld. AR also argued that the rebate is partly hit by limitation of time because the period involved is August 2007 to M .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to picture as the service concerned is Business Auxiliary Service and the export is deemed to have taken place if the beneficiary is abroad and the payment is received in foreign exchange in India. These two conditions being satisfied, I hold the service to be export of service. Reliance is placed on the case of Microsoft Corpn. (I) P. Ltd. 2014 (36) STR 766 (Tri-Del) as well as the case of Paul M .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X