Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2015 (10) TMI 368

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Act, 1944 for the period of delay in sanctioning the refund. The issue involved in the present case whether appellant is entitle for interest on refund which has already been sanctioned under Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 for the delayed period in sanctioning the said refund. 2. Shri. Sanjay Hasija, Ld. Superintendent (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue submits that interest in the present case is not applicable for the reason that respondent have delayed in providing complete information and due to which sanction of claim got delayed. He further submits that this refund was sanctioned against remand order of the CESTAT wherein certain information was directed to be verified therefore the refund was not mature before passing....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....te of refund application and there is no restrictions or prohibition provided under Section11B to avoid the interest. 4. I have carefully considered the submission made by both sides. 5. I find that after passing of Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd case, if refund is sanctioned belatedly beyond three months from the date of application, interest is unavoidably payable to the assessee. On careful reading of the Commissioner (Appeals) order, I find that he has given elaborated findings and allowed interest on the refund, the findings is extracted below: 4. I have gone through the appeal papers, written submissions during the course of personal hearing and above mentioned relied upon instructions and orders/jud....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to be an order passed under the said sub-section (2) for the purposes of this section.] 7. I find that as per provisions of Section 11BB of the said Act, it has been laid down that in case amount is not refunded by the department within three months from the date of application, then the department is obliged to pay interest, calculated at the rate notified by the Central Government, to the claimant from the date of expiry of three months from the date of receipt of application till the date of refund of such duty. 8. I further find that vide explanation to the said Section 11BB of the said Act it has been explained that in case any order of refund is made by the Commissioner (Appeals), Appellate Tribunal or any court against an order pas....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt to reject the claim of interest of the appellants is that the department conducted certain verifications as per directions of the Hon'able CESTAT, vide its order dated 09.03.2011; that the order has been passed within time period of three months from the date of latest/last information/clarification that was made available to the department and hence the provisions of Section 11BB of the said Act are not attracted for these cases. 12. I find that basically department was obliged to examine the refund claim in right perspective and decide the issue. It is clear from the facts of the case that department had not carried out the necessary verifications while disposing of the refund applications and when the matter reached to the Hon&#3....