Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2015 (11) TMI 257

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and act as a broker in arranging sale of the imported cars. Intelligence was received by DRI Mumbai Zonal unit which indicated that Shri Roshan Somjee of Pune possessed one Toyota Prado Vehicle imported into India by mis-declaration under the Transfer of Residence Scheme. Pursuant to said information, inquires were made and it was further gathered that the Toyota Prado was imported by Shri Mohammed Haneef Husain in December 2003 at Mumbai Port by mis-declaring the model code of the vehicle and year of manufacture as 1998, whereas, the vehicle was actually of a higher model. In January 2004, Shri Mohammad Haneef Husain had approached the appellant and had showed his desire to sell the vehicle for a good price; Appellant had prepared necessa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at allegation of violation of post import condition is erroneous as the lower authorities have failed to notice that the subject car was registered in name of Roshan Somjee only, after 2 years of its importation. Therefore there is no violation of post import condition. 4.2 Further it is stated that 'NO SALE' condition, within 2 years of importation of the subject car, is required to be adhered and complied by the importer and not by the appellant neither it is alleged in SCN that the appellant has not completed the importer to sell the car nor the Ld Add Commissioner has arrived at such a conclusion. 4.3 Further the learned counsel submits that the allegation on appellant of abetting in the offence does not arise, as the importer had....