9911796707
Advanced Search 
TMI Blog2015 (12) TMI 26X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Revenue is arising out of order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-IV, Kolkata in appeal No.185/CIT(A)-IV/06-07 dated 09.04.2008. Assessment was framed by ACIT, Circle-4, Kolkata u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') vide his order dated 29.12.2006 for assessment year 2004-05. Revenue has following grounds of appeal:- "1. That the Ld. CIT(A) ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tating that when the interest amount is not ascertainable there can be no quantification of interest. 5. That the Ld. CIT(A) had erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 9,58,86,086/- on account of notional interest. Assessee had given loans to certain companies/persons and did not charge any interest. A.O calculated the interest at the rate of 18% and made the addition. 6. That the Ld. CIT(A) ha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that Ld. CIT(A) has passed order in contravention of Sec. 250(2) of the Act and stated that the AO has not been given the opportunity of being heard at the time of hearing before the CIT(A). As per the section 250(2) of the Act the AO has right to attend the hearing but the CIT(A) has not issued the notice to the AO to attend hearing the said matter in appeal. Therefore the order passed by the CI ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... all give notice of the same to the appellant and to the [Assessing] Officer against whose order the appeal is preferred. (2) The following shall have the right to be heard at the hearing of the appeal - (a) the appellant, either in person or by an authorised representative; (b) the [Assessing] Officer, either in person or by a representative." 4. We have perused the records of the Ld. CIT(A ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
