Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2012 (8) TMI 962

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....RA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For the Petitioner : Shri Ajay Gandhi & Shri Dayakar For the Respondent : Shri K.Viswanatham, DR ORDER Per D.Karunakara Rao, Accountant Member: By these applications under S.254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the applicant-assessee seeks rectification of the order of the Tribunal dated 8th June, 2012, insofar as it relates to ITA No.372/Hyd/2010 and 373/Hyd/201....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of the said grounds of the Revenue's appeals, i.e. grounds No.2 and 3 of the Revenue, Tribunal set aside the matter to the file of the CIT(A) for want of a speaking order. Thus, the Tribunal has taken conflicting views on a common issue while dealing with the grounds of the assessee and the Revenue. 3. The Learned Departmental Representative on the other hand, opposed the above submissions of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for other advances as well, the assessee was given relief by the Tribunal, relying on the decision of the Jaipur Bench of the Tribunal in the case of ANZ Reality Pvt. Ltd. V/s. ITO (120 TTJ 142), duly extracting the relevant para of the said decision, viz. para 6, which is relevant for the proposition that payment of deposits to non-shareholders does not attract TDS provisions of S.194 of the Act.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as follows- "15. During the proceedings before us, learned counsel for the assessee argued stating that the CIT(A) rightly allowed the assessee's appeals on the issue of applicability of provisions of S.2(22)(e) of the Act to the two kinds of advances -trade credits on one side and processing charges on the other. On the other hand, the Learned Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated ....