2011 (3) TMI 1642

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... arising from the order ofCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-Valsad dated 22-10-2008. The Revenuehas challenged the deletion of penalty of ₹ 2,87,115/- levied under section271(1)(c ) of the Act. 2. The facts in brief as emerged from the corresponding penalty orderpassed under section 271(1)(c ) dated 31-3-2008 and the assessment orderpassed u/s. 143(3) dated 29-12-2006 were that the ass .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... essing Officer,however, due to difference of opinion the explanation of the assessee wasrejected. On a careful perusal it is evident that there is no finding of fact in theassessment order that either the claim was found bogus or non-genuine. It isalso not the case of the Revenue, while levying the concealment penalty, thatthere was either a wrong statement or a false material was furnished along .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X