2015 (12) TMI 1547
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed in directing to allow exemption u/s. 10A of I.T. Act, 1961 without appreciating that neither A.O. nor CIT(A) has done any comparative study about the genuinenes s and reasonableness of expenses and profit earned. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating that the assessee has declared very high and abnormal profit and claimed it as exempt u/s 10A, this aspects needs detailed investigation especially in view of the fact that USA f irm and the assessee has common direct control jointly by one individual and his relatives. 3. The appellant prays that the order of Ld.CIT(A) on the above ground be set aside and matter be restored to the Assessing Officer. 4. The appella....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n the range of Rs. 11,000/- to Rs. 15,000/- in the city of Mumbai. The AO then concluded that no actual business was done and the entire set up was created to claim tax-free income in India and therefore proceeded to deny the exemption claimed by the assessee u/s 10A. Being aggrieved by the order of the AO, the assessee preferred appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The assessee made a detailed submission in support of its claim and also furnished the additional evidences as mentioned in para 4.2 of the impugned order. The Ld. CIT(A) forwarded the said evidences to the AO for verification and comments. The AO thereafter conducted the investigation in respect of the evidences submitted by the assessee and came to the following conclusion: "The fi....