Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2007 (10) TMI 222

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e manufacture of Elastic Railway Clips falling under Ch. Heading No. 73 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. On scrutiny of ER-I Return for the quarter ending December, 2002, it was noticed that the appellants received Price Variation Bills (P.V.B) and paid the differential duty on the basis of Price Variation Bills. It has been alleged that the appellants paid part of the amoun....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ore-III [2007 (78) R.L.T. 281 (CESTAT-Bangalore)] held that interest is not leviable in respect of duty paid on supplementary invoice. 14 Ld. DR reiterates the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals). He submits that the appellants availed Cenvat credit and, therefore, the decision of the Tribunal is not applicable herein. He further submits that that there is no dispute that at the time of cleara....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....from the factory or the warehouse. It is seen that in present case, Price Variation Bills were raised due to Price Variation Clause after removal of the goods from the factory. So Rule 8 is not applicable in the present case. Therefore, the allegation against the appellants that they have wrongly utilized the Cenvat credit towards payment of duty against PVB is not sustainable. The Tribunal in the....