Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (2) TMI 125

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules,2004 and penalty of Rs. 75,000/- has also been imposed upon them. 2. The appellants' contention is that steel and cement on which credit had been availed were an integral part of kiln, cooler and chimney used in the appellants' factory premises for manufacturing HR coils, plates etc., that there was a technological requirement to place the capital goods in a particular manner, in terms of its height, angles etc. and this requirement was fulfilled by using steel and cement for providing the necessary foundation and support for the capital goods, and therefore, eligible to credit in the light of Tribunal's decision in the case of Bellary Steel & Alloys vs. CCE [2005(180)ELT 92], Mukund Ltd vs Commissioner [2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r put to any use in the manufacturing operations.   This is the view held by the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of Aditya Cement vs. UOI [2000 (221)E.L.T. 362  (Raj)] wherein the High Court reversed the decision of the Tribunal  reported in 2003(159)E.L.T. 1005, rejecting the assessee's claim  for credit on steel  items such as angles, channels, beams   used as supporting structure  for different machines, and  machinery on the ground that the said items were neither machine or machineries  nor were they  componenets/spare parts/accessores thereof.  The High Court held as under : -   "It is clear that so far as the items of iron and steel are concerned, t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g structures for the various machineries where the same has been used as supporting structures for the various machineries.  Reliance has been placed on the decision in the case of Global Sugar Ltd. v. C.E., Kanpur 2000(119) ELT 611(T)".    6. The Tribunal's decision in Ispat Industries Ltd supra has considered almost all the earlier decisions on the subject and concluded that as long as steel and cement are clearly linked with the machinery, i.e. the specified capital goods, and are used for production of the final product, the same would qualify as capital goods.  It was, however, held that such items will not be eligible for credit when used for constructing factory buildings.  7. As regards the Hon'ble ....