Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2016 (10) TMI 13

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2013, S.B. Sales Tax Revision Petition No. 114 of 2013, S.B. Sales Tax Revision Petition No. 122 of 2013 - -<br>CST, VAT & Sales Tax<br>Jainendra Kumar Ranka, J. For the Petitioner : Tanvi Sahai, Meenal Sahai, RB Mathur For the Respondent : Devendra Kumar, Dinesh Kumar, Deepak Goyal S.B. Sales Tax Revision Petition No. 43 of 2014, S.B. Sales Tax Revision Petition No. 44 of 2014, S.B. Sales Ta....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... price shown in the VAT invoice keeping in view the discount/incentive received by them from the respective dealers. 2. While the Assessing Officer disallowed the ITC and it was the contention of Revenue that the assessee cannot sell the goods lower than what is shown in the VAT invoice of purchase and simultaneously to claim ITC as per the invoice. However, both the Appellate Authorities have co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ue. It is further contended that the Revenue sought to challenge the said judgment of this court before the apex court and the apex court dismissed the SLP vide order and judgment dated 24.3.2014 in Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) CC 4413/2014. It has also been brought to the notice of the court that this court in the case of CTO v. M/s Sharda Agencies [S.B. STR No.70/2014] vide judgment dated 6.2....