TMI Blog2016 (12) TMI 285X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ith transportation to the sugar factory, justified? - Held that: - the issue involved in this case is now squarely covered by the judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Samarth Sevabhavi Trust & Ors.[2015 (3) TMI 1170 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT], where it was held that there is no supply of labour to the sugar factory concerned. The respondents have und ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... (Technical) Shri V.B. Gaikwad, Advocate for Appellant Shri S.R. Nair, E.O. (AR) Shri B.K. Iyer, Supdt. (AR) for Respondent ORDER These two appeals are directed against Orders-in-Original No. 65/P-III/ST/COMMR/2011-12 dated 30.03.2012 and No. 01/P-III/ST/COMMR/2012-13 dated 18.04.2012passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise Service Tax, Pune-III. 2. Since the issue invol ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... vari Khore Cane Transport Co. (P) Ltd. - 2015 (38) STR 468 (Bom) . It is also noticed that Revenue in Central Excise Appellate authority ppeal No. (Lodge) 204 of 2014, 205 of 2014 and 202 of 2014 has withdrawn the appeals filed before the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay on the identical issue. 5. In view of the foregoing, this Court holds that the issue is no more res integra. Accordingly, th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
