TMI Blog2001 (11) TMI 1032X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s appeal is whether the High Court ought not to have exercised its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for granting relief in case of alleged breach of contract. Settled law writ is not the remedy for enforcing contractual obligations. It is to be reiterated that writ petition under Article 226 is not the proper proceeding for adjudicating such disputes. Under the law, i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... final payment. That writ petition was allowed despite the objection raised by the appellants that respondent committed breach of contract and the Court should not exercise its writ jurisdiction in such cases. L.P.A. No.945 of 2000 was also dismissed by the High Court by its judgment and order dated 11.1.2001. Hence this appeal. The short facts are that the tender of respondent-Company having it ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... PVC fittings within stipulated time. Finally, appellants terminated the contract on 10.12.1996 and purchased the fittings at a higher price. Thereafter, while paying the final bill to the respondent, the difference of amount which was required to be incurred by the appellants was deducted. Respondent preferred the writ petition before the High Court. The learned Single Judge arrived at the conc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ants to make the due amount of respondent - company with interest at the rate of 6%, within six months. The aforesaid order was confirmed in LPA. In our view, it is apparent that the order passed by the High Court is on the face of it illegal and erroneous. It is true that many matters could be decided after referring to the contentions raised in the affidavits and counter-affidavits, but that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
