Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2016 (12) TMI 1359

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... a Board Meeting on an urgent basis to consider various items reflected in the draft agenda (Annexure-F). The application has been necessitated because of order dated August 30, 2016 passed by this Tribunal where applicant-respondent No.1 had given undertaking to the effect that no meeting of its Board of Directors was to be held without prior permission of the Tribunal. 2. Applicant-Respondent No.1 has pleaded that the Non applicant-petitioner holds merely 0.06% shares and had resigned as Managing Director of the company w.e.f. August 12, 2016. He was in charge of the day to day affairs of the company and its subsidiaries. As a result of his resignation several key managerial personnel of the company including the Company Secretary and Ch....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y the applicant/respondent No.1-company. It is alleged that after filing of the petition the Respondent No.1-company has been making several attempts to frustrate the cause agitated by the petitioner before this Tribunal. In that regard a reference has been made to the letter dated August 25, 2016 filed by the representative of Respondent No.1, filing of Form DIR 12 late in the evening of August 29, 2016 and under the guise of statutory compliances, the proposed Board meeting has been convened to legitimize the various illegal and oppressive actions of Respondent No.2. The agenda does not contain any specific proposal of reviving the business of the company or any proposal to reconstruct the oppressions. 4. The non applicant-petitioner has....