Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2007 (10) TMI 671

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t no.2 were inter alia engaged in manufacture of Iron and Steel products and were availing modvat credit of duty paid on various capital goods under Central Excise Rules, 1944. The respondent no.2 availed of modvat credit on cement, steel plates and bars. The Commissioner, Central Excise, Nagpur issued notice calling upon to show cause as to why inadmissible credit taken by them on cement and steel plates and bars should not be disallowed and recovered from them under rule 57(U) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Commissioner passed orders disallowing modvat credit on cement and steel bars and waste and also imposed penalty. Being aggrieved, the respondent no.2 filed appeal before the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribuna....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ontra, Mr. Bhangde, learned senior counsel at the outset submitted that in identical facts situation the revenue has conceded that the question raised has been decided against the revenue by the Apex Court in the case of Vikram Cement vs. Commissioner, Central Excise (2006 (194) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.). In support of his submission, Mr. Bhangde placed reliance upon the orders dated 13th June 2007 passed by this court in rejecting the Central Excise Appeal Nos. 74/04, 35/04, 36/04, 37/04 and 41/04. Mr. Bhangde further submitted that since in other matters involving identical issues the revenue has conceded and appeals have been dismissed the revenue is not entitled to challenge the orders passed by the CESTAT. In support of this submissions Mr. Bhan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re, qualify for availing Modvat credit. Per clause (b), the components, spare parts and accessories of the goods mentioned in clause (a) used for the purposes enumerated therein would also be 'Capital goods' and qualify for Modvat credit entitlement Clause (c) makes moulds and dies, generating sets and weigh bridges used in the factory of the manufacturers as capital goods and thus qualify for availing Modvat credit. The goods enumerated in clause (c) need not be used for producing the final product or used in the process of any goods for the manufacture of final product or used for bringing about any change in any substance for the manufacture of final product and the only requirement is that the same should be used in the factory ....