2017 (1) TMI 198

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... : Alkesh Sharma ORDER 1. The instant petitions are directed against order dt 25.11.2005 passed by the Rajasthan Tax Board, Ajmer, in Appeal Nos.1353 & 549/2004/Jaipur, by which the appeal filed by Revenue has been dismissed allowing the appeal filed by the assessee. 2. Brief facts noticed are that the respondent assessee had purchased a vehicle from Gurgaon (Haryana) and it was noticed by the o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ction and deleted the tax, interest and penalty. 5. Learned counsel for the Revenue brought to the notice of court that this court in the case of CTO V. M/s P.R. Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. [2016] 88 VST (Raj.), has already taken into consideration the self same question and has decided the petition filed by the Revenue in favour of the Revenue and has directed that the matter would be required to be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... jurisdiction to assess the assessee expeditiously and within a period of four months from the date certified copy of the order is placed before it. Counsel for the Revenue may also send a copy of this order to the Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur, who may intimate to the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction to assess the assessee-respondent as aforesaid, to avoid furth .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X