2016 (11) TMI 1396

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... no. 3. - Held that:- The order dated 26.10.2016 is corrected. The next date of the listing of the appeal is corrected to read as 16.11.2016 instead of 10.11.2016 and presence of Mr. Vikram Jetly, advocate in the said order shall be read for respondent no. 1 and 3. Perusal of order sheet of the appeal shows that the final arguments in the appeal were concluded on 02.02.2016 and judgment was r .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ccount of the typographical error the same has been noted as 10.11.2016. Further, it is contended that counsel for the respondent had appeared not only for respondent no. 1 but also for respondent no. 3. In view of the above, the order dated 26.10.2016 is corrected. The next date of the listing of the appeal is corrected to read as 16.11.2016 instead of 10.11.2016 and presence of Mr. Vikram .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X