Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2017 (5) TMI 1333

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ate for Appellant Shri Sandeep Kumar Singh, Deputy Commissioner (AR), for Respondent ORDER Per: Anil G. Shakkanvar The above stated two appeals are directed against Order-in-original No.MP (Dem-58/2009, 59/2009 & 60/2009) 73-75/2009 dated 30/11/2009 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Allahabad. Since the impugned Order-in-Original is common in respect of both the above stated ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e assessable value of goods by mis-declaring the place of removal resulting in passing on higher Cenvat credit to M/s Hindalco Industries Ltd. Therefore, M/s Brahmaputra Carbon Ltd. were issued with a show cause notice dated 14.11.2006 for the goods cleared from 16.05.2004 to 31.12.2004. M/s Guwahati Carbon Ltd. were also issued with a show cause notice dated 25.04.2006 wherein there were allegati....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d 10.10.2007 was issued to M/s Guwahati Carbon Ltd. covering a period from 11.06.2003 to 31.01.2005, wherein there was a proposal to impose penalty on M/s Guwahati Carbon Ltd. The above stated 3 show cause notices were adjudicated through the impugned Order-in-Original dated 30.11.2009. The original authority has imposed penalty of Rs. 50 lakhs on M/s Guwahati Carbon Ltd. under Rule 26 of Central ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the input supplier and the said appeal was allowed. Learned Counsel for the appellant contended that appeal filed by M/s Hindalco Industries Ltd. is allowed and therefore their appeal also should be allowed. 4. Heard the learned A. R. for revenue, who has supported the impugned Order-in-Original. 5. Having considered the rival contentions and on perusal of the records, we find that the learned ....