Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2017 (10) TMI 854

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e assessee to the above mentioned Contractors have been included in the payment made by them - The petitioner shall produce all the supporting documents before the Original Authority for decision afresh - appeal allowed by way of remand. - W. P. No. 25678 of 2017 - - - Dated:- 3-10-2017 - S. Vaidyanathan, J. For the Petitioner : Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan For the Respondents : Mr.K.Ravi ORDER The petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition seeking to quash the impugned order in original No.STC/6/2014-ADC (LTU) passed by the 1st respondent herein vide C.No.IV/09/440/2011-STC/ADJ, dated 25.02.2014. 2. According to the petitioner concern, it is registered with the Service Tax Department with Registration No.AOOPM6824ST00 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ndent vide letter dated 21.04.2017, demanded the petitioner to pay the amount of service tax with interest and penalty imposed as per the said order-in-original, immediately. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner is before this Court. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner represented that the petitioner had submitted service tax challans in respect of M/s.Tech Sharp Engineers (P) Ltd., Chennai and M/s.Gopal Engineering Works, Vishakapatnam. But, the authority on verification of the said challans, came to the conclusion that there is payment of service tax by the Contractors, but it could not be established as to whether the service tax in respect of the service rendered by the assessee to the above mentioned Contractors have been include .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e rendered by the petitioner has been taken note of and that service tax has been paid by the Contractors, this Court, in order to give an opportunity to the petitioner, interferes with the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent and remits the matter to the 1st respondent/Original authority for fresh consideration. The petitioner shall produce all the supporting documents before the Original Authority within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receipt of the same, the Original Authority shall hear the petitioner and pass a detailed order within a period of one month from the date of personal hearing of the petitioner. This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Conseq .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates