Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2012 (8) TMI 1102

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssessee arises from the order of the CIT(A), Jammu, dated 19.03.2012 for the assessment year 2008-09. 2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: "1. That the worthy CIT(A) is not justified in confirming the addition of ld. A.O. in disallowing a sum of Rs. 15,60,000/- u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on account of non deduction of tax on this sum which is a lease rent fully....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he action of the Assessing Officer. 4. Mr. R.K. Gupta, the Ld. counsel for the assessee, invited our attention to the decision of the Special Bench of ITAT, Visakhapatnam in the case of M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports, Visakhapatnam vs. ACIT Range-1, Visakhapatnam, in ITA No.477/Viz/2008 for the assessment year 2005-06 dated 29.03.2012, where it has been decided that section 40(a)(ia) of the A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Special Bench of ITAT Visakhapatnam (supra) was not available with the ld. CIT(A), who had passed the order on 19.03.2012 whereas the decision of the Special Bench has been pronounced thereafter. On perusal of the decision of the Special Bench of ITAT, Visakhapatnam in the case of M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports, Visakhapatnam vs. ACIT Range-1, Visakhapatnam (supra), where it has been held....