2018 (4) TMI 282

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... : Mrs.R.Hemalatha For Respondent : Mr.K.Venkatesh, GA ORDER Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondent. Heard both. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. Added to that, because of the glaring error committed by the Assessing Officer, this Court is inclined to dispose of the main writ petition itself at the admission stage. 2. Th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Again, the petitioner submitted their objections on 09.6.2017. The first reply dated 21.2.2014 was received in the office of the Assistant Commercial Tax Officer, Hosur (South) and signed by the Superintendent on 03.3.2014. The second reply dated 09.6.2017 was received by the office of the respondent by affixing his seal and signature dated 13.6.2017. However, in the impugned assessment order, t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the case of Madras Granites (P) Ltd. Vs. CTO, Arisipalayam Circle, Salem [reported in (2006) 146 STC 642]. For the above reasons, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the respondent for a fresh consideration and the respondent .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X