9911796707
Advanced Search 
TMI Blog2019 (12) TMI 942X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... T. Usha Devi, DC (AR) for the Respondent ORDER Brief facts of the case are that the appellants are registered for providing Business Auxiliary Service. They are also engaged in the processing of iron and steel sheets on job work basis to M/s.Tata Steel Ltd. (TSL, for short). They availed refund claim for Rs. 59,05,952/- under Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. It was the case of the appel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... submitted that the appellant is confining the contest of refund in the present appeal to one invoice which is to the tune of Rs. 47,21,090/-. The contest with regard to other two invoices is given up by the appellant since the amount has already been adjusted to the future credit of the customer. 3. Ld. counsel submitted that at the time of adjudication before the original authority, though a da ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... She submitted that Commissioner o(Appeals) has rejected the refund claim after examining the worksheet submitted by the appellant and therefore there is no ground to interfere with the impugned order. 6. Heard both sides. 7. On perusal of the order-in-original passed by the original authority, it is seen that the appellant was given date for personal hearing. Later as there was no representatio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... efund claim afresh after taking cognisance of all the documents produced by the appellant. Needless to say that the appellant shall be given a personal hearing and also sufficient opportunity to produce additional evidence, if any.
8. Impugned order is set aside. The appeal is allowed by way of remand to the original authority in the above terms.
(Order dictated and pronounced in court) X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
