TMI Blog2015 (5) TMI 1203X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... India, Moscow regarding confirmation of the authenticity of documents submitted by the respondent. On 17 th August, 2001 a letter received through fact transmission by the Deputy Secretary, Medical Council of India from the Counsellor (Education) & Director (JNCC), Embassy of India, Moscow regarding information received from the Vice Rector on International Activities, People's Friendship, University of Russia, Moscow that the Diploma in question was never issued to the respondent by the University along with the unsigned letter dated 13 th August, 2001 of the Vice-Rector on International Activity of People's Friendship University of Russia, Moscow. On the basis of written complaint of the Deputy Secretary of the Medical Council of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... any person. There is nothing on record to connect the fact that this information was sent by People's Friendship University of Russia. There is no letter issued or sent by People's Friendship University of Russia to state this fact at any point of time. Embassy of India is not the appropriate and competent authority to state this fact. The information is based upon the document which are neither prepared nor maintained by Embassy of India. It could only transmit the information as sent by the People's Friendship University of Russia. There is nothing on record to support such transmission. No attempt is made to receive the report directly from People's Friendship University of Russia. In the consideration opinion of this Co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of India. I have carefully perused both the relevant documents. It is clear from the letter written by Vice- Rector of People's Friendship University of Russia that the letter dated 13th August, 2001 does not bear any signatures or stamp of the person writing said letter. This also does not bear any stamp or authorization from the concerned People's Friendship University of Russia. From mere perusal of this document, document cannot be said to have been written or issued by the person authorized to give the information. Since the document is unsigned, this has no bearing on the case, even if the charge is framed on the basis of this document, the accused/ respondent cannot be convicted solely on the basis of this document. Sh. S ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|