Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (1) TMI 120

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng the year for deposit in the capital account and thereby confirming the addition of Rs. 7,50,500/-." 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in trading of mustard oil, mustard cake, general grocery etc. During the year under consideration, she has introduce capital of Rs. 7,50,500/- in her business and the source of such capital introduction has been explained as withdrawals made by the assessee from her capital account of the previous financial year. However, the AO did not accept the submission of the assessee for the reason that the withdrawals made during the preceding financial year were deposited in the current financial year have no weight because in his view, the withdrawals may have been utiliz....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ial year amounting to Rs. 7 lac and same was available at the beginning of the financial year and which was reintroduced in the capital account during the year under consideration, copy of capital account of previous financial year and an affidavit of the assessee was also submitted. It was accordingly submitted that the addition so made by the AO may be directed to be deleted. Further, in support of the proposition that merely because there is time gap between withdrawals and deposits, no addition can be made in absence of any cogent material in possession of the Assessing officer, the ld AR has placed reliance on the following decisions:- * ACIT vs Baldevraj Charla and Ors. (2009) 121 TTJ 366 (Delhi) * S.R. Venkatta Ratnam vs. Cit (19....