Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1991 (7) TMI 32

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ve, the direction to the Wealth-tax Officer to grant the exemption is justified ?" The assessee purchased a house property on June 7, 1971, at Bangalore for a total consideration of Rs. 1,12,730. In the declaration dated June 22, 1972, filed before the assessing authority, the assessee had stated that the property was purchased by her for the "thavazhi" consisting of herself, her son, Dr. Mohan P. Thampy, and daughter, Smt. Thara K. Nair. However, by a letter dated January 1, 1973, the assessee had informed the Department that, as on the date of purchase, the assessee had with her a sum of Rs. 31,818 belonging to the "thavazhi" (as per her books of account) and the said amount was made available to purchase the property. That, however, was....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on claimed by the assessee under section 5(1)(iv) of the Act. Expanding this argument, he submitted that the exemption under section 5(1)(iv) can be granted only in the event of a house being treated as converted property within the meaning of section 4(1A). Since the assessee has not claimed exemption under any other sub-clauses of section 5, there is no need to go into the question whether this converted property requires to be excluded while computing the net wealth of the assessee. Counsel for the assessee, on the other hand, contended that since the house was purchased with the funds belonging to the assessee also, the assessee is entitled to get the benefit of section 5(1)(iv) because the said section provides for the exclusion of on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ; (b) the converted property or any part thereof shall be deemed to be assets belonging to the individual and not to the family;... (3) where the value of any assets is to be included in the net wealth of an assessee in accordance with clause (a) of sub-section (1) or sub-section (1A), -.... (b) the provisions of section 5 shall apply in relation to such assets as if such assets were assets belonging to the assessee." It is clear from the plain and unambiguous language used in section 4(1A) that the separate property of an individual, being a member of Hindu undivided family, thrown by him into the hotchpot of the family directly or indirectly and otherwise than for adequate consideration will be called converted property and this conv....