2020 (3) TMI 1097

..... tioner has submitted that the petitioner is not in a position to pay the requisite amount in terms of Section 35F of the Act - If that be the position, we have no alternative but to dismiss the IA. Application dismissed. - I.A. No. 02/2019 And 04/2019 In WP(C) No. 20 of 2018 - 5-3-2020 - HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CJ. AND HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, J. ORDER Arup Kumar G .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

..... petitioner within the time-frame as may be fixed by this Court. Today, Mr. Jorgay Namka, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not in a position to pay the requisite amount in terms of Section 35F of the Act. If that be the position, we have no alternative but to dismiss the IA. Accordingly, IA No. 02 of 2019 stands dismissed. IA No. 04 of 2019 is an application .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X