TMI Blog2018 (11) TMI 1780X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... an appeal - HELD THAT:- The petitioner made payment of ₹ 9,59,190/-, representing 12.5% of the taxes for the year 2013-2014 (CST). The amount was paid on 13.11.2018 - the writ petition is ordered, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the 1st respondent. Appeal allowed by way of remand. - WP NO. 39418 of 2018 - - - Dated:- 19-11-2018 - THE HON BLE SRI JUS ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ner has come up with the above writ petition. The reason stated by the petitioner is that one of the employees who was in charge, indulged in malpractices forcing the management to suspend him and initiate disciplinary proceedings. The petitioner claims that they were not aware of these orders. Therefore, the petitioner seeks one opportunity. The reason why the petitioner seeks one opportuni ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... filing an appeal. But , the employee, who was incharge and who was subsequently, suspended in contemplation of disciplinary proceedings, failed to file the appeal. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the issue lies in a narrow campus. Since the petitioner has already paid 12.5% of the disputed tax, the request of the petitioner for granting one more opportunity woul ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
