Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1991 (2) TMI 94

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssessment for the assessment year 1969-70, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred to this court the following six questions of law under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The questions read thus : " (1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in cancelling the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ? (2) Whet....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the Tribunal that no opportunity was given to the assessee when the Explanation to section 271(1)(c) was invoked by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner is sustainable in view of the notice of the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner dated February 1, 1974 ? (6) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in rejecting the miscellaneous applicatio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Act Charge interest under section 217. Give concession in tax as per Taxation Concessions Order, 1964." Though section 271(1)(c) was not mentioned as one of the sections which the Income-tax Officer was satisfied was attracted, the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner to whom the reference was made imposed penalty of Rs. 3 lakhs under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by his order da....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sment that he was satisfied about the applicability of the provisions of section 271(1)(c). He however, stated that the facts referred to in the order of assessment clearly indicate that the assessee had concealed his income. On the other hand, Mr. Pikale, learned counsel for the assessee, relied upon the Supreme Court's decision, CIT v. S. V. Angidi Chettiar [1962] 44 ITR 739, and on a decision o....