Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1990 (8) TMI 69

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... as five questions referred to this court by the Tribunal as questions of law. The questions are : "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the dividend paid on cumulative preference shares of Rs. 9,67,065 is to be included while computing the capital of the assessee for the purpose of surtax assessment ? 2. Whether, on the facts and ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ere includible in computing the capital of the assessee under rule 1 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 ? 5. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that a sum of Rs. 11,71,505 representing the increase in liability on account of devaluation of the rupee should be included in computing the capital of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unsel are agreed that it is covered by our court's judgment in the assessee's own case reported in CIT v. National Rayon Corporation Ltd. [1986] 160 ITR 716. Accordingly, we have to hold that the reserve to the extent it represents debenture redemption reserve is not to be treated as a reserve and the reserve to the extent it represents gratuity reserve will be treated as reserve only in so far as....