2020 (10) TMI 429

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ents : By Government Pleader Dr. Thushara James JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P2 order passed by the 1st respondent, rejecting an application preferred by him for condonation of delay in filing returns wherein he had raised the claim for input tax credit. It is seen from Ext.P2 order of the respondents that the refusal to consider the delay condonation applic .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as to keep the issue of belated filing of return and condonation thereof alive. The petitioner has accordingly prefered Ext.P5 appeal before the Joint Commissioner [Appeals], Ernakulam, who is suo motu impleaded as the additional 3rd respondent in the Writ Petition. 4. Taking note of the above situation and finding that if the 1st respondent considers the delay condonation application and finds .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ll then consider Ext.P5 appeal and pass orders thereon based on the orders passed by the 1st respondent on the delay condonation application as directed. The 1st respondent shall pass orders in Ext.P5 appeal within three weeks after the date of receipt of the order of the 1st respondent and after hearing the petitioner. iv. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition as well as a co .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X