Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2021 (2) TMI 113

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in view the said memo, Sri M.Ramakrishna, learned counsel is permitted to represent the petitioner. 2. This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to quash the order passed in C.C.No.675/2013 arising out of PCR No.127/2013 dated 22.08.2016 and so also, quash the order dated 31.08.2016 passed by the Prl.Civil Judge and JMFC, Harihara. 3. It is transpired in the private complaint filed by the respondent/complainant before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Harihara for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I.Act by following the requisite conditions in the provision itself. Subsequent to filing of private complaint by the complainant, the case came to be registered in PCR No.127/2013. Subsequent to registration of the case, the sworn st....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....filed by the accused and complainant. The case was posted to 27.08.2016. Thereafter, the matter was adjourned to 31.08.2016. On 31.08.2016 the order was passed by the trial Court dismissing the application filed by the complainant for restoration for no merits. 6. It is contended by petitioners' counsel that the complainant had filed the private complaint against the accused after following the requisite conditions of the N.I.Act. But the same came to be dismissed for non- prosecution. Therefore, the counsel for the petitioner seeks for considering the grounds as urged in this petition and seeks for intervention of this Court, if not, there shall be miscarriage of justice and certainly the complainant would be the sufferer. On this pre....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f. The cheque amount was of Rs. 2,40,000/- in favour of the complainant towards repayment of due amount. However, the detail description of the cheque is mentioned in the private complaint filed by the complainant. But the case in C.C.No.675/2013 came to be dismissed for non- prosecution on 22.08.2016 and on the same day, the complainant had filed application for restoration of the dismissal order for non-prosecution. After hearing both the sides, the court below dismissed the application for restoration for there being no merits. 9. The Negotiable Instruments Act is a special enactment which delivers social justice as well criminal justice. The cause of action arise only after return of the instrument from the Bank as where the cheque was....