TMI Blog2013 (4) TMI 960X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... his appeal filed by the Revenue, directed against an order dated 15.12.2010, its grievance is that the CIT(Appeals) failed to consider the decision of Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Visvas Promoters (P) Ltd. v. ITAT (323 ITR 114), while allowing deduction of ₹ 3,58,91,270/- to the assessee under Section 80-IB(10) of income-tax (in short 'the Act'). 2. Facts apr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ter came up before us, learned A.R. submitted that the issue stood resolved in favour of assessee by virtue of the decision of Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT v. Sanghvi and Doshi Enterprise [TC(A) Nos. 581 & 582 of 2011 and 314 & 315 of 2012 & M.P. No. 1 of 2011 dated 1.11.2012]. 5. Per contra, learned A.R. fairly agreed that the issue of pro rata deduction under Section ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|